Support SOX Compliance
SOX compliance is about proving internal control over financial reporting (ICFR). For most companies, the hard part is not the policy. It is building repeatable IT controls, collecting evidence on schedule, and staying aligned with external auditor expectations.
Neutral Partners helps you scope and implement IT general controls (ITGCs), document and test controls, remediate gaps, and build an evidence cadence that survives quarter closes, new hires, and system changes. The goal is predictable audits and fewer last‑minute fire drills.

At a Glance
- Best for: public companies, companies preparing for IPO, and private companies adopting public company control discipline
- Focus areas: ITGCs, application controls, and evidence of control operation
- Core ITGC domains: access management, change management, and IT operations
- Common failure point: controls exist, but evidence is inconsistent or not reproducible
Start with scoping and a realistic evidence plan.
Schedule a Discovery Session ➜What Is SOX
The Sarbanes‑Oxley Act (SOX) introduced requirements for public companies to establish and report on internal controls, including controls over financial reporting. Section 404 is the section most teams feel directly because it requires management assessment of ICFR and, for many issuers, external auditor attestation.
SOX is not a one‑time project. Controls must operate consistently and be evidenced every period.

Who Needs SOX Readiness
SOX work typically applies to:
- Public companies: required to maintain and report on ICFR controls
- Companies preparing for IPO: building control maturity before becoming an issuer
- Companies with complex financial systems: high transaction volumes, multiple ERPs, or heavy automation
- High growth organizations: rapid headcount and system changes that create control drift
Even when not legally required yet, adopting SOX discipline early reduces future audit disruption.
What SOX Covers
SOX focuses on financial reporting risk. Control scope depends on your financial statement risks and the systems that support them.
Common control themes include:
- Governance and tone at the top: policies, accountability, and oversight
- Financial process controls: close processes, reconciliations, approvals, and review controls
- IT general controls (ITGCs): foundational IT controls that support reliance on systems
- Application controls: automated controls within systems that impact financial reporting
- Third‑party and outsourced controls: service providers and key vendor dependencies
For many companies, ITGCs are the foundation. If ITGCs are weak, auditors will expand substantive testing, which increases cost and disruption.
SOX ITGCs Explained
ITGCs are the controls that support the reliability of systems used in financial reporting. External auditors often expect ITGC coverage in three core domains.
Access management
- user provisioning and deprovisioning
- privileged access controls and approvals
- periodic access reviews
- segregation of duties where relevant
Change management
- change tickets and approvals
- testing evidence and peer review
- deployment controls and rollback procedures
- emergency change handling with after‑action review
IT operations
- job monitoring and incident handling
- backups and recovery testing
- vulnerability management and patching
- logging and monitoring routines
The key is not to write a perfect policy. The key is to make controls repeatable and collect proof on schedule.
Evidence Auditors Expect
Auditors test both design and operating effectiveness. Evidence must be consistent, dated, and tied to each control.
Common evidence includes:
- Control documentation: control descriptions, owners, frequency, and systems in scope
- Access evidence: user lists, approvals, access review records, privileged access logs
- Change evidence: tickets, approvals, test results, code review records, deployment logs
- Operations evidence: incident tickets, job monitoring records, backup logs, recovery test results
- Vendor evidence: SOC reports, monitoring routines, and complementary controls
- Management review evidence: review sign‑offs, exception handling, and follow‑up actions
Evidence should be reproducible. If proof depends on one person remembering where a screenshot lives, the program will break.
SOX Roadmap
Scope systems and processes
- identify financial statement risks and in‑scope processes
- identify systems that support those processes
- define what is in scope for ITGCs and application controls
Design and document controls
- define control owners and frequencies
- document control steps and evidence requirements
- identify key reports and the controls that rely on them
Implement controls and build evidence cadence
- operationalize access, change, and IT operations controls
- build a recurring calendar for evidence collection
- train control owners on what proof is required
Test controls and remediate gaps
- perform management testing or internal audit testing
- document exceptions and root causes
- remediate and retest
Support external audit and ongoing improvement
- coordinate auditor requests and evidence submission
- maintain version control on evidence and control narratives
- refine controls as systems and risks change
SOX is easier when evidence is routine.
We will scope your ITGCs, build practical controls, and create an evidence cadence that holds up in the audit.
Schedule a Discovery Session ➜Common SOX Gaps
- Unclear scope: teams do not agree on which systems and processes are in scope
- Access review inconsistency: reviews occur, but evidence and follow‑up are incomplete
- Privileged access sprawl: shared admin accounts and weak approval trails
- Change control gaps: emergency changes and hotfixes without after‑action documentation
- Manual evidence chaos: screenshots and exports are inconsistent and not reproducible
- Vendor reliance without monitoring: SOC reports exist, but complementary controls are not operated
How Neutral Partners Helps
We help finance and IT teams build controls that work in real operations.
What we deliver
- SOX readiness assessment: scope review, control design evaluation, and evidence gap identification
- ITGC design and implementation: access, change, and operations controls that are repeatable
- Evidence mapping: clear proof requirements and storage structure
- Testing support: management testing, exception tracking, remediation planning, and retesting
- Audit support: evidence request management and auditor coordination
- Sustainment: cadence, templates, and training for control owners
Proof matters. Since 2017, we have maintained a 100% audit success rate across more than 700 successful audits and assessments. We keep that record by making evidence simple, consistent, and repeatable.

SOX FAQs
Is SOX only for public companies?
SOX legal requirements apply to public companies, but many private companies adopt SOX style controls in preparation for IPO, acquisitions, or investor requirements. The discipline improves audit outcomes even before it is mandatory.
What are ITGCs and why do they matter?
ITGCs are foundational controls that support the reliability of systems used in financial reporting. If ITGCs are weak, auditors expand testing and costs increase.
How long does SOX readiness take?
It depends on maturity and scope. Teams move faster when they start with clear scoping and a realistic evidence cadence. The biggest delays come from unclear ownership and inconsistent evidence.
Can we automate SOX evidence?
Yes, in many cases. Automation works best when controls are clearly defined and systems can export consistent proof. We often start with a manual cadence, then automate the highest value evidence sources.
What is the biggest SOX risk?
Control drift. Systems, processes, and staff change constantly. If your control design does not account for change, evidence will break and audits will become reactive.
Key Resources
- SEC final rule on management’s report on ICFR (Section 404)
- PCAOB AS 2201 integrated audit standard
- COSO Internal Control guidance
- Sarbanes‑Oxley Act text (GovInfo)
Useful Resources
- [Internal] SOX ITGC control library
- [Internal] Evidence calendar template
- [Internal] Auditor request tracker
Make SOX a Growth Lever
When SOX controls run as part of normal operations, audits become predictable and the finance team spends less time chasing evidence. We will help you build ITGCs that work, then keep them working through change.
Start with a short working session. We will map your scope, your top gaps, and the next three moves.